Schade → Neto
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Schade to Neto costs an extra £0.3m and loses 6 total points on the season. Neto currently sits at 2.9% ownership compared to Schade's 14.3%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Neto averages a form rating of 10.0 compared to Schade's 0.5, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Neto at 143,461 net vs Schade at 74,204 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Brentford
ChelseaFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Schade with Neto in FPL?
Neto has a form rating of 10.0 compared to Schade's 0.5, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Neto costs £6.5m vs Schade's £6.2m.
How does Neto compare to Schade on points?
Neto has 34 total points this season vs Schade's 40 points. Schade leads by 6 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Neto worth the price over Schade?
Neto costs £6.5m while Schade costs £6.2m — a difference of £0.3m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Neto delivers 34 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Schade and Neto?
Schade has a net transfer flow of 74,204 this gameweek, while Neto has 143,461 net transfers. Positive momentum for Neto suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Schade to Neto transfer?
If Neto (£6.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Schade (£6.2m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.