Schade → Groß
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Schade to Groß saves £0.0m in budget and gains 18 total points on the season. Groß currently sits at 45.7% ownership compared to Schade's 14.3%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Groß averages a form rating of 5.5 compared to Schade's 0.5, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Groß at 202,686 net vs Schade at 74,204 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Brentford
BrightonFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Schade with Groß in FPL?
Groß has a form rating of 5.5 compared to Schade's 0.5, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Groß costs £6.2m vs Schade's £6.2m.
How does Groß compare to Schade on points?
Groß has 58 total points this season vs Schade's 40 points. Groß leads by 18 points overall.
Is Groß worth the price over Schade?
Groß costs £6.2m while Schade costs £6.2m — a difference of £0.0m. You save £0.0m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Schade and Groß?
Schade has a net transfer flow of 74,204 this gameweek, while Groß has 202,686 net transfers. Positive momentum for Groß suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Schade to Groß transfer?
If Groß (£6.2m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Schade (£6.2m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.