Rogers → Cherki
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Rogers to Cherki saves £0.0m in budget and gains 3 total points on the season. Cherki currently sits at 39.1% ownership compared to Rogers's 49.9%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Cherki averages a form rating of 3.3 compared to Rogers's 4.0, so the outgoing player actually has stronger recent returns — consider whether fixtures justify the move. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Cherki at -11,352 net vs Rogers at 27,500 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Chelsea
Man CityFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Rogers with Cherki in FPL?
Cherki has a form rating of 3.3 compared to Rogers's 4.0, so the form difference is marginal — consider fixtures and upcoming blanks before moving. Cherki costs £8.0m vs Rogers's £8.0m.
How does Cherki compare to Rogers on points?
Cherki has 44 total points this season vs Rogers's 41 points. Cherki leads by 3 points overall.
Is Cherki worth the price over Rogers?
Cherki costs £8.0m while Rogers costs £8.0m — a difference of £0.0m. You save £0.0m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Rogers and Cherki?
Rogers has a net transfer flow of 27,500 this gameweek, while Cherki has -11,352 net transfers. Transfer activity for Cherki is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the Rogers to Cherki transfer?
If Cherki (£8.0m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Rogers (£8.0m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.