Last refreshed

Rice → Rogers

Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.

Moving from Rice to Rogers costs an extra £0.4m and gains 9 total points on the season. Rogers currently sits at 41.1% ownership compared to Rice's 11.3%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.

In recent gameweeks, Rogers averages a form rating of 5.0 compared to Rice's 3.5, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Rogers at 139,394 net vs Rice at -100,552 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.

MetricRiceRogers
ClubARSArsenalCHEChelsea
Price£7.4m£7.8m
Form3.55.0
Points2029
Net Transfers (GW)-100,552139,394

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I replace Rice with Rogers in FPL?
Rogers has a form rating of 5.0 compared to Rice's 3.5, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Rogers costs £7.8m vs Rice's £7.4m.
How does Rogers compare to Rice on points?
Rogers has 29 total points this season vs Rice's 20 points. Rogers leads by 9 points overall.
Is Rogers worth the price over Rice?
Rogers costs £7.8m while Rice costs £7.4m — a difference of £0.4m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Rogers delivers 29 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Rice and Rogers?
Rice has a net transfer flow of -100,552 this gameweek, while Rogers has 139,394 net transfers. Positive momentum for Rogers suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Rice to Rogers transfer?
If Rogers (£7.8m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Rice (£7.4m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.