Last refreshed
Kinsky → Verbruggen
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Kinsky to Verbruggen saves £0.0m in budget and gains 5 total points on the season. Verbruggen currently sits at 21.6% ownership compared to Kinsky's 17.0%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Verbruggen averages a form rating of 7.0 compared to Kinsky's 4.5, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Verbruggen at -3,720 net vs Kinsky at -117,399 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Kinsky | Verbruggen |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Spurs |  Brighton |
| Price | £4.5m | £4.5m |
| Form | 4.5 | 7.0 |
| Points | 18 | 23 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -117,399 | -3,720 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Kinsky with Verbruggen in FPL?
Verbruggen has a form rating of 7.0 compared to Kinsky's 4.5, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Verbruggen costs £4.5m vs Kinsky's £4.5m.
How does Verbruggen compare to Kinsky on points?
Verbruggen has 23 total points this season vs Kinsky's 18 points. Verbruggen leads by 5 points overall.
Is Verbruggen worth the price over Kinsky?
Verbruggen costs £4.5m while Kinsky costs £4.5m — a difference of £0.0m. You save £0.0m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Kinsky and Verbruggen?
Kinsky has a net transfer flow of -117,399 this gameweek, while Verbruggen has -3,720 net transfers. Transfer activity for Verbruggen is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the Kinsky to Verbruggen transfer?
If Verbruggen (£4.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Kinsky (£4.5m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.