Kinsky → Suzuki
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Kinsky to Suzuki costs an extra £0.6m and gains 3 total points on the season. Suzuki currently sits at 2.1% ownership compared to Kinsky's 14.6%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Suzuki averages a form rating of 3.3 compared to Kinsky's 1.7, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Suzuki at 951 net vs Kinsky at -1,743 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Kinsky | Suzuki |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Spurs |  Aston Villa |
| Price | £4.4m | £5.0m |
| Form | 1.7 | 3.3 |
| Points | 23 | 26 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -1,743 | 951 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Kinsky with Suzuki in FPL?
Suzuki has a form rating of 3.3 compared to Kinsky's 1.7, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Suzuki costs £5.0m vs Kinsky's £4.4m.
How does Suzuki compare to Kinsky on points?
Suzuki has 26 total points this season vs Kinsky's 23 points. Suzuki leads by 3 points overall.
Is Suzuki worth the price over Kinsky?
Suzuki costs £5.0m while Kinsky costs £4.4m — a difference of £0.6m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Suzuki delivers 26 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Kinsky and Suzuki?
Kinsky has a net transfer flow of -1,743 this gameweek, while Suzuki has 951 net transfers. Positive momentum for Suzuki suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Kinsky to Suzuki transfer?
If Suzuki (£5.0m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Kinsky (£4.4m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.