King → Tavernier
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from King to Tavernier costs an extra £0.7m and gains 14 total points on the season. Tavernier currently sits at 13.5% ownership compared to King's 4.6%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Tavernier averages a form rating of 3.7 compared to King's 1.3, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Tavernier at 18,775 net vs King at -1,552 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | King | Tavernier |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Fulham |  Bournemouth |
| Price | £5.6m | £6.3m |
| Form | 1.3 | 3.7 |
| Points | 28 | 42 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -1,552 | 18,775 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace King with Tavernier in FPL?
Tavernier has a form rating of 3.7 compared to King's 1.3, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Tavernier costs £6.3m vs King's £5.6m.
How does Tavernier compare to King on points?
Tavernier has 42 total points this season vs King's 28 points. Tavernier leads by 14 points overall.
Is Tavernier worth the price over King?
Tavernier costs £6.3m while King costs £5.6m — a difference of £0.7m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Tavernier delivers 42 season points.
What are the transfer trends for King and Tavernier?
King has a net transfer flow of -1,552 this gameweek, while Tavernier has 18,775 net transfers. Positive momentum for Tavernier suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the King to Tavernier transfer?
If Tavernier (£6.3m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If King (£5.6m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.