Gvardiol → Konsa
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Gvardiol to Konsa saves £1.2m in budget and loses 3 total points on the season. Konsa currently sits at 19.2% ownership compared to Gvardiol's 27.4%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Konsa averages a form rating of 9.0 compared to Gvardiol's 1.7, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Konsa at 61,894 net vs Gvardiol at -19,584 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Man City
ArsenalFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Gvardiol with Konsa in FPL?
Konsa has a form rating of 9.0 compared to Gvardiol's 1.7, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Konsa costs £4.6m vs Gvardiol's £5.8m.
How does Konsa compare to Gvardiol on points?
Konsa has 39 total points this season vs Gvardiol's 42 points. Gvardiol leads by 3 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Konsa worth the price over Gvardiol?
Konsa costs £4.6m while Gvardiol costs £5.8m — a difference of £1.2m. You save £1.2m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Gvardiol and Konsa?
Gvardiol has a net transfer flow of -19,584 this gameweek, while Konsa has 61,894 net transfers. Positive momentum for Konsa suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Gvardiol to Konsa transfer?
If Konsa (£4.6m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Gvardiol (£5.8m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.