Gibbs-White → Tavernier
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Gibbs-White to Tavernier saves £1.7m in budget and gains 12 total points on the season. Tavernier currently sits at 10.5% ownership compared to Gibbs-White's 11.5%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Tavernier averages a form rating of 5.5 compared to Gibbs-White's 1.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Tavernier at 286,505 net vs Gibbs-White at -78,835 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Gibbs-White | Tavernier |
|---|---|---|
| Club | Nott'm Forest | Bournemouth |
| Price | £7.9m | £6.2m |
| Form | 1.0 | 5.5 |
| Points | 30 | 42 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -78,835 | 286,505 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Gibbs-White with Tavernier in FPL?
Tavernier has a form rating of 5.5 compared to Gibbs-White's 1.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Tavernier costs £6.2m vs Gibbs-White's £7.9m.
How does Tavernier compare to Gibbs-White on points?
Tavernier has 42 total points this season vs Gibbs-White's 30 points. Tavernier leads by 12 points overall.
Is Tavernier worth the price over Gibbs-White?
Tavernier costs £6.2m while Gibbs-White costs £7.9m — a difference of £1.7m. You save £1.7m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Gibbs-White and Tavernier?
Gibbs-White has a net transfer flow of -78,835 this gameweek, while Tavernier has 286,505 net transfers. Positive momentum for Tavernier suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Gibbs-White to Tavernier transfer?
If Tavernier (£6.2m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Gibbs-White (£7.9m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.
Nott'm Forest
Bournemouth