Last refreshed
Gibbs-White → Schade
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Gibbs-White to Schade saves £1.8m in budget and gains 11 total points on the season. Schade currently sits at 12.6% ownership compared to Gibbs-White's 15.7%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Schade averages a form rating of 12.0 compared to Gibbs-White's 5.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Schade at 456,893 net vs Gibbs-White at -19,165 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Gibbs-White | Schade |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Nott'm Forest |  Brentford |
| Price | £8.0m | £6.2m |
| Form | 5.0 | 12.0 |
| Points | 28 | 39 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -19,165 | 456,893 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Gibbs-White with Schade in FPL?
Schade has a form rating of 12.0 compared to Gibbs-White's 5.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Schade costs £6.2m vs Gibbs-White's £8.0m.
How does Schade compare to Gibbs-White on points?
Schade has 39 total points this season vs Gibbs-White's 28 points. Schade leads by 11 points overall.
Is Schade worth the price over Gibbs-White?
Schade costs £6.2m while Gibbs-White costs £8.0m — a difference of £1.8m. You save £1.8m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Gibbs-White and Schade?
Gibbs-White has a net transfer flow of -19,165 this gameweek, while Schade has 456,893 net transfers. Positive momentum for Schade suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Gibbs-White to Schade transfer?
If Schade (£6.2m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Gibbs-White (£8.0m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.