Last refreshed
Gakpo → Rogers
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Gakpo to Rogers costs an extra £0.6m and loses 3 total points on the season. Rogers currently sits at 41.1% ownership compared to Gakpo's 11.9%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Rogers averages a form rating of 5.0 compared to Gakpo's 2.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Rogers at 139,394 net vs Gakpo at -84,486 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Liverpool
ChelseaFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Gakpo with Rogers in FPL?
Rogers has a form rating of 5.0 compared to Gakpo's 2.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Rogers costs £7.8m vs Gakpo's £7.2m.
How does Rogers compare to Gakpo on points?
Rogers has 29 total points this season vs Gakpo's 32 points. Gakpo leads by 3 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Rogers worth the price over Gakpo?
Rogers costs £7.8m while Gakpo costs £7.2m — a difference of £0.6m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Rogers delivers 29 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Gakpo and Rogers?
Gakpo has a net transfer flow of -84,486 this gameweek, while Rogers has 139,394 net transfers. Positive momentum for Rogers suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Gakpo to Rogers transfer?
If Rogers (£7.8m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Gakpo (£7.2m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.