Ødegaard → Neto
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Ødegaard to Neto saves £0.3m in budget and gains 1 total points on the season. Neto currently sits at 2.9% ownership compared to Ødegaard's 18.5%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Neto averages a form rating of 10.0 compared to Ødegaard's 2.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Neto at 143,461 net vs Ødegaard at -57,138 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Arsenal
ChelseaFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Ødegaard with Neto in FPL?
Neto has a form rating of 10.0 compared to Ødegaard's 2.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Neto costs £6.5m vs Ødegaard's £6.8m.
How does Neto compare to Ødegaard on points?
Neto has 34 total points this season vs Ødegaard's 33 points. Neto leads by 1 points overall.
Is Neto worth the price over Ødegaard?
Neto costs £6.5m while Ødegaard costs £6.8m — a difference of £0.3m. You save £0.3m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Ødegaard and Neto?
Ødegaard has a net transfer flow of -57,138 this gameweek, while Neto has 143,461 net transfers. Positive momentum for Neto suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Ødegaard to Neto transfer?
If Neto (£6.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Ødegaard (£6.8m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.