Last refreshed
Current season · FPL 2026/27 Source season: 2026/27. Data date: 2026-10-10 · Official FPL API · refreshed 2026-10-10

Ødegaard vs Ndiaye

FPL 2026/27 head-to-head comparison for two midfielder options.

Matchup verdict

No clear model winner. The 2026/27 snapshot does not separate these two midfielders cleanly. The evidence is level or incomplete, so budget, role, and squad structure should break the tie.

Modelled Scores: 4.09 vs 4.09; the page keeps factual values separate below.

At-a-glance matrix

MetricØdegaardNdiaye
PriceFactual £6.8mFactual £5.8m
FormFactual 2.5Factual 3
Points per gameFactual 5.8Factual 4.4
Total pointsFactual 29Factual 22
OwnershipFactual 20.2%Factual 6.1%
MinutesFactual 377Factual 385
Goal involvementsFactual 2 (G+A)Factual 2 (G+A)

Detailed statistics

MetricØdegaardNdiaye
GoalsFactual 2Factual 0
AssistsFactual 0Factual 2
BonusFactual 6Factual 1
ICT indexFactual 36.2Factual 26.1
Expected goalsFactual 1.08Factual 0.38
Expected assistsFactual 1.32Factual 0.58

Fixture outlook · next six gameweeks

Ødegaard · avg FDR 3.0

  • GW6 LEE (H) · FDR 3
  • GW7 NFO (A) · FDR 3
  • GW8 EVE (H) · FDR 3
  • GW9 LIV (A) · FDR 4
  • GW10 HUL (H) · FDR 2
  • GW11 NEW (A) · FDR 3

Ndiaye · avg FDR 2.8

  • GW6 LIV (A) · FDR 4
  • GW7 IPS (H) · FDR 2
  • GW8 AVL (A) · FDR 3
  • GW9 BHA (H) · FDR 3
  • GW10 NFO (A) · FDR 3
  • GW11 FUL (H) · FDR 2

Scenario caveats

Safer route

Prefer the higher-ownership option when protecting rank and when both roles and fixtures are otherwise similar.

Upside route

Prefer the lower-owned option only when its minutes, role, and fixture evidence are strong enough to justify the extra variance.

Factual Player and fixture values come from the source snapshot. Modelled The all-round signal is a comparison aid, not an official FPL statistic.

Related profiles and comparisons

Decide between these players for my squad

Use the existing demo flow to add squad context before committing to this comparison.

Decide between these players for my squad