Rogers vs M.Salah
Head-to-head FPL comparison for 2025/26. Stats, fixtures, and transfer trends.
Rogers has the edge right now
For FPL 2025/26, FPLai gives Rogers the quick edge over M.Salah on current form: 4.2 vs 0.5. Compare price, total points, ownership, fixtures, and transfer momentum below before making a final transfer decision for your own squad.
Rogers vs M.Salah at a glance
- AI quick pick — Rogers (AVL) based on current form
- Price — Rogers: £7.3m; M.Salah: £14.0m
- Form — Rogers: 4.2; M.Salah: 0.5
- Total points — Rogers: 169; M.Salah: 117
- Ownership — Rogers: 20.5%; M.Salah: 14.2%
- Fixture difficulty — Rogers: 5.0 avg FDR; M.Salah: 3.0 avg FDR
Quick answers
Rogers or M.Salah for FPL?
FPLai's quick pick is Rogers on current form, but the full comparison below weighs price, fixtures, ownership, and points as well.
Should I transfer M.Salah to Rogers?
Only if the form and fixture edge fits your budget and transfer plan. Check the verdict section before spending a free transfer or taking a hit.
Rogers currently has the edge on form (4.2 vs 0.5), while Rogers leads on total points (169 vs 117). At £7.3m vs £14.0m, Rogers is the budget-friendly choice.
Stats Comparison
| Rogers | Stat | M.Salah |
|---|---|---|
| £7.3m | Price | £14.0m |
| 169 | Total Points | 117 |
| 4.2 | Form | 0.5 |
| 4.6 | Pts/Game | 4.5 |
| 20.5% | Ownership | 14.2% |
| 10 | Goals | 7 |
| 8 | Assists | 6 |
| 6.84 | xG | 7.98 |
| 4.32 | xA | 5.00 |
| 232.0 | ICT Index | 196.0 |
| 17 | Bonus | 10 |
| 3280 | Minutes | 2071 |
| -107,185 | Net Transfers | 53,450 |
Fixture Difficulty (Next 6 GWs)
Verdict
Rogers gets the edge. While both are strong midfielder options, Rogers currently offers the better combination of form, fixtures, and value.
- Form: Rogers is the in-form pick at 4.2 vs 0.5. Neither is on fire right now.
- Fixtures: M.Salah has the easier upcoming run (avg FDR 3.0 vs 5.0). A noticeable advantage that could translate to returns.
- Value: Rogers returns 23.2 points per £1m vs M.Salah's 8.4. Rogers is the better value pick, and the £6.7m price gap frees budget for upgrades elsewhere.
- Goal threat: Rogers has more goal involvements (18 vs 13 G+A). Expected stats favour M.Salah on xG.
- Transfer trend: M.Salah has stronger transfer momentum (53,450 net vs -107,185). Heavy demand — a price rise is likely.
- Ownership: Both are lower-owned (20.5% vs 14.2%) — either pick offers differential upside.
Related
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is better in FPL, Rogers or M.Salah?
Should I pick Rogers or M.Salah for FPL?
Rogers vs M.Salah: who has better fixtures?
Get Personalized Transfer Advice
Our AI analyzes your squad to recommend the best pick between these two players.
Analyze My Team