Last refreshed

J.Timber vs Tarkowski

Head-to-head FPL comparison for 2025/26. Stats, fixtures, and transfer trends.

J.Timber J.Timber
ARS ARS · Defender
vs
Tarkowski Tarkowski
EVE EVE · Defender
Matchup verdict

Tarkowski has the edge right now

Signal
J.Timber
Tarkowski
Form score0-10 current form
J.Timber0.0/10
Tarkowski3.0/10
Total pointsseason total
J.Timber149
Tarkowski170
Fixture ratingavg FDR, lower is easier
J.Timber0.0 FDR
Tarkowski0.0 FDR
Safer pick
J.Timber
15.2% owned
Upside pick
Tarkowski
12.6% owned
Quick answer

Tarkowski has the edge, but your squad decides the move

Tarkowski leads this comparison on current form, but the right transfer depends on your budget, existing players, captaincy cover, and next two moves. Rate your FPL team before spending a transfer.

Tarkowski currently has the edge on form (3 vs 0), while Tarkowski leads on total points (170 vs 149). At £6.0m vs £5.8m, Tarkowski is the budget-friendly choice.

Stats Comparison

J.Timber Stat Tarkowski
£6.0m Price £5.8m
149 Total Points 170
0.0 Form 3.0
5.0 Pts/Game 4.6
15.2% Ownership 12.6%
3 Goals 2
6 Assists 3
4.71 xG 2.53
1.53 xA 2.10
125.7 ICT Index 165.7
9 Bonus 12
2452 Minutes 3330
0 Net Transfers 0

Fixture Difficulty (Next 6 GWs)

PlayerClubAvg
J.TimberARSARS0.0
TarkowskiEVEEVE0.0

Verdict

Tarkowski gets the edge. While both are strong defender options, Tarkowski currently offers the better combination of form, fixtures, and value.

  • Form: Tarkowski is the in-form pick at 3 vs 0. Neither is on fire right now.
  • Fixtures: Near-identical difficulty ahead (0.0 vs 0.0). Fixtures won't separate them.
  • Value: J.Timber returns 24.8 points per £1m vs Tarkowski's 29.3. Tarkowski is the better value pick.
  • Goal threat: J.Timber has more goal involvements (9 vs 5 G+A). Expected stats also back J.Timber on xG.
  • Transfer trend: Similar transfer activity this week.
  • Ownership: Both are lower-owned (15.2% vs 12.6%) — either pick offers differential upside.

Related

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better in FPL, J.Timber or Tarkowski?
Based on current form, Tarkowski has the edge with a form rating of 3. However, J.Timber has 149 total points vs Tarkowski's 170.
Should I pick J.Timber or Tarkowski for FPL?
J.Timber costs £6.0m with 15.2% ownership, while Tarkowski costs £5.8m with 12.6% ownership. Consider upcoming fixtures and your budget.
J.Timber vs Tarkowski: who has better fixtures?
Check the fixture difficulty comparison below. The player with more green (easy) fixtures in the next 6 gameweeks has a schedule advantage.

Get Personalized Transfer Advice

Our AI analyzes your squad to recommend the best pick between these two players.

Rate My FPL Team