J.Timber vs Hill
Head-to-head FPL comparison for 2025/26. Stats, fixtures, and transfer trends.
Hill has the edge right now
For FPL 2025/26, FPLai gives Hill the quick edge over J.Timber on current form: 5.7 vs 0.0. Compare price, total points, ownership, fixtures, and transfer momentum below before making a final transfer decision for your own squad.
J.Timber vs Hill at a glance
- AI quick pick — Hill (BOU) based on current form
- Price — J.Timber: £6.0m; Hill: £4.2m
- Form — J.Timber: 0.0; Hill: 5.7
- Total points — J.Timber: 149; Hill: 107
- Ownership — J.Timber: 15.2%; Hill: 7.3%
- Fixture difficulty — J.Timber: 3.0 avg FDR; Hill: 3.0 avg FDR
Quick answers
J.Timber or Hill for FPL?
FPLai's quick pick is Hill on current form, but the full comparison below weighs price, fixtures, ownership, and points as well.
Should I transfer J.Timber to Hill?
Only if the form and fixture edge fits your budget and transfer plan. Check the verdict section before spending a free transfer or taking a hit.
Hill currently has the edge on form (5.7 vs 0), while J.Timber leads on total points (149 vs 107). At £6.0m vs £4.2m, Hill is the budget-friendly choice.
Stats Comparison
| J.Timber | Stat | Hill |
|---|---|---|
| £6.0m | Price | £4.2m |
| 149 | Total Points | 107 |
| 0.0 | Form | 5.7 |
| 5.0 | Pts/Game | 3.8 |
| 15.2% | Ownership | 7.3% |
| 3 | Goals | 0 |
| 6 | Assists | 3 |
| 4.71 | xG | 0.89 |
| 1.53 | xA | 1.15 |
| 125.7 | ICT Index | 84.4 |
| 9 | Bonus | 4 |
| 2452 | Minutes | 2012 |
| -43,869 | Net Transfers | 7,738 |
Fixture Difficulty (Next 6 GWs)
Verdict
Hill gets the edge. While both are strong defender options, Hill currently offers the better combination of form, fixtures, and value.
- Form: Hill is the in-form pick at 5.7 vs 0. Solid recent returns.
- Fixtures: Near-identical difficulty ahead (3.0 vs 3.0). Fixtures won't separate them.
- Value: J.Timber returns 24.8 points per £1m vs Hill's 25.5. Hill is the better value pick, and the £1.8m price gap frees budget for upgrades elsewhere.
- Goal threat: J.Timber has more goal involvements (9 vs 3 G+A). Expected stats also back J.Timber on xG.
- Transfer trend: Hill has stronger transfer momentum (7,738 net vs -43,869). The crowd is moving but no price change is imminent.
- Ownership: Both are lower-owned (15.2% vs 7.3%) — either pick offers differential upside.
Related
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is better in FPL, J.Timber or Hill?
Should I pick J.Timber or Hill for FPL?
J.Timber vs Hill: who has better fixtures?
Get Personalized Transfer Advice
Our AI analyzes your squad to recommend the best pick between these two players.
Analyze My Team