Last refreshed

Ekitiké vs Mateta

Head-to-head FPL comparison for 2025/26. Stats, fixtures, and transfer trends.

Ekitiké Ekitiké
LIV LIV · Forward
vs
Mateta Mateta
CRY CRY · Forward
Matchup verdict

Mateta has the edge right now

Signal
Ekitiké
Mateta
Form score0-10 current form
Ekitiké0.0/10
Mateta2.0/10
Total pointsseason total
Ekitiké125
Mateta108
Fixture ratingavg FDR, lower is easier
Ekitiké3.0 FDR
Mateta4.0 FDR
Safer pick
Ekitiké
15.7% owned
Upside pick
Mateta
8.2% owned

For FPL 2025/26, FPLai gives Mateta the quick edge over Ekitiké on current form: 2.0 vs 0.0. Compare price, total points, ownership, fixtures, and transfer momentum below before making a final transfer decision for your own squad.

Ekitiké vs Mateta at a glance

  1. AI quick pick — Mateta (CRY) based on current form
  2. Price — Ekitiké: £9.0m; Mateta: £7.6m
  3. Form — Ekitiké: 0.0; Mateta: 2.0
  4. Total points — Ekitiké: 125; Mateta: 108
  5. Ownership — Ekitiké: 15.7%; Mateta: 8.2%
  6. Fixture difficulty — Ekitiké: 3.0 avg FDR; Mateta: 4.0 avg FDR

Quick answers

Ekitiké or Mateta for FPL?

FPLai's quick pick is Mateta on current form, but the full comparison below weighs price, fixtures, ownership, and points as well.

Should I transfer Ekitiké to Mateta?

Only if the form and fixture edge fits your budget and transfer plan. Check the verdict section before spending a free transfer or taking a hit.

Mateta currently has the edge on form (2 vs 0), while Ekitiké leads on total points (125 vs 108). At £9.0m vs £7.6m, Mateta is the budget-friendly choice.

Stats Comparison

Ekitiké Stat Mateta
£9.0m Price £7.6m
125 Total Points 108
0.0 Form 2.0
4.5 Pts/Game 3.5
15.7% Ownership 8.2%
11 Goals 11
4 Assists 0
10.10 xG 14.04
2.45 xA 1.32
156.2 ICT Index 145.9
22 Bonus 12
1797 Minutes 2197
-28,635 Net Transfers -71,208

Fixture Difficulty (Next 6 GWs)

PlayerClubGW38Avg
EkitikéLIVLIV BRE (H) 3.0
MatetaCRYCRY ARS (H) 4.0

Verdict

Ekitiké gets the edge. While both are strong forward options, Ekitiké currently offers the better combination of form, fixtures, and value.

  • Form: Mateta is the in-form pick at 2 vs 0. Neither is on fire right now.
  • Fixtures: Ekitiké has the easier upcoming run (avg FDR 3.0 vs 4.0). A noticeable advantage that could translate to returns.
  • Value: Ekitiké returns 13.9 points per £1m vs Mateta's 14.2. Mateta is the better value pick, and the £1.4m price gap frees budget for upgrades elsewhere.
  • Goal threat: Ekitiké has more goal involvements (15 vs 11 G+A). Expected stats favour Mateta on xG.
  • Transfer trend: Ekitiké has stronger transfer momentum (+-28,635 net vs -71,208). The crowd is moving but no price change is imminent.
  • Ownership: Both are lower-owned (15.7% vs 8.2%) — either pick offers differential upside.

Related

Ekitiké Profile Mateta Profile Should I Buy Ekitiké? Should I Buy Mateta? Best Forwards Season Hub

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is better in FPL, Ekitiké or Mateta?
Based on current form, Mateta has the edge with a form rating of 2. However, Ekitiké has 125 total points vs Mateta's 108.
Should I pick Ekitiké or Mateta for FPL?
Ekitiké costs £9.0m with 15.7% ownership, while Mateta costs £7.6m with 8.2% ownership. Consider upcoming fixtures and your budget.
Ekitiké vs Mateta: who has better fixtures?
Check the fixture difficulty comparison below. The player with more green (easy) fixtures in the next 6 gameweeks has a schedule advantage.

Get Personalized Transfer Advice

Our AI analyzes your squad to recommend the best pick between these two players.

Analyze My Team