Last refreshed
Welbeck → Richarlison
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Welbeck to Richarlison costs an extra £0.2m and loses 8 total points on the season. Richarlison currently sits at 7.9% ownership compared to Welbeck's 8.5%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Richarlison averages a form rating of 5.5 compared to Welbeck's 3.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Richarlison at 214,489 net vs Welbeck at -72,060 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Welbeck | Richarlison |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Brighton |  Spurs |
| Price | £6.3m | £6.5m |
| Form | 3.0 | 5.5 |
| Points | 125 | 117 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -72,060 | 214,489 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Welbeck with Richarlison in FPL?
Richarlison has a form rating of 5.5 compared to Welbeck's 3.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Richarlison costs £6.5m vs Welbeck's £6.3m.
How does Richarlison compare to Welbeck on points?
Richarlison has 117 total points this season vs Welbeck's 125 points. Welbeck leads by 8 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Richarlison worth the price over Welbeck?
Richarlison costs £6.5m while Welbeck costs £6.3m — a difference of £0.2m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Richarlison delivers 117 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Welbeck and Richarlison?
Welbeck has a net transfer flow of -72,060 this gameweek, while Richarlison has 214,489 net transfers. Positive momentum for Richarlison suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Welbeck to Richarlison transfer?
If Richarlison (£6.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Welbeck (£6.3m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.