Last refreshed

Watkins → Richarlison

Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.

Moving from Watkins to Richarlison saves £2.2m in budget and loses 37 total points on the season. Richarlison currently sits at 7.9% ownership compared to Watkins's 13.2%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.

In recent gameweeks, Richarlison averages a form rating of 5.5 compared to Watkins's 6.8, so the outgoing player actually has stronger recent returns — consider whether fixtures justify the move. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Richarlison at 214,489 net vs Watkins at -25,552 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.

MetricWatkinsRicharlison
ClubAVLAston VillaTOTSpurs
Price£8.7m£6.5m
Form6.85.5
Points154117
Net Transfers (GW)-25,552214,489

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I replace Watkins with Richarlison in FPL?
Richarlison has a form rating of 5.5 compared to Watkins's 6.8, so the form difference is marginal — consider fixtures and upcoming blanks before moving. Richarlison costs £6.5m vs Watkins's £8.7m.
How does Richarlison compare to Watkins on points?
Richarlison has 117 total points this season vs Watkins's 154 points. Watkins leads by 37 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Richarlison worth the price over Watkins?
Richarlison costs £6.5m while Watkins costs £8.7m — a difference of £2.2m. You save £2.2m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Watkins and Richarlison?
Watkins has a net transfer flow of -25,552 this gameweek, while Richarlison has 214,489 net transfers. Positive momentum for Richarlison suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Watkins to Richarlison transfer?
If Richarlison (£6.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Watkins (£8.7m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.