Last refreshed
Sarr → Anderson
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Sarr to Anderson saves £0.7m in budget and gains 62 total points on the season. Anderson currently sits at 9.2% ownership compared to Sarr's 5.7%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Anderson averages a form rating of 8.5 compared to Sarr's 4.2, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Anderson at 218,840 net vs Sarr at -64,588 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Sarr | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Crystal Palace |  Nott'm Forest |
| Price | £6.4m | £5.7m |
| Form | 4.2 | 8.5 |
| Points | 116 | 178 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -64,588 | 218,840 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Sarr with Anderson in FPL?
Anderson has a form rating of 8.5 compared to Sarr's 4.2, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Anderson costs £5.7m vs Sarr's £6.4m.
How does Anderson compare to Sarr on points?
Anderson has 178 total points this season vs Sarr's 116 points. Anderson leads by 62 points overall.
Is Anderson worth the price over Sarr?
Anderson costs £5.7m while Sarr costs £6.4m — a difference of £0.7m. You save £0.7m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Sarr and Anderson?
Sarr has a net transfer flow of -64,588 this gameweek, while Anderson has 218,840 net transfers. Positive momentum for Anderson suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Sarr to Anderson transfer?
If Anderson (£5.7m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Sarr (£6.4m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.