Last refreshed
Saka → Madueke
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Saka to Madueke saves £3.2m in budget and loses 85 total points on the season. Madueke currently sits at 0.8% ownership compared to Saka's 11.6%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Madueke averages a form rating of 11.0 compared to Saka's 0.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Madueke at 0 net vs Saka at 0 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
ArsenalFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Saka with Madueke in FPL?
Madueke has a form rating of 11.0 compared to Saka's 0.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Madueke costs £6.8m vs Saka's £10.0m.
How does Madueke compare to Saka on points?
Madueke has 72 total points this season vs Saka's 157 points. Saka leads by 85 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Madueke worth the price over Saka?
Madueke costs £6.8m while Saka costs £10.0m — a difference of £3.2m. You save £3.2m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Saka and Madueke?
Saka has a net transfer flow of 0 this gameweek, while Madueke has 0 net transfers. Transfer activity for Madueke is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the Saka to Madueke transfer?
If Madueke (£6.8m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Saka (£10.0m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.