Last refreshed
Saka → Anderson
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Saka to Anderson saves £4.3m in budget and gains 21 total points on the season. Anderson currently sits at 9.2% ownership compared to Saka's 12.5%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Anderson averages a form rating of 8.5 compared to Saka's 6.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Anderson at 218,840 net vs Saka at -49,286 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Saka | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Arsenal |  Nott'm Forest |
| Price | £10.0m | £5.7m |
| Form | 6.0 | 8.5 |
| Points | 157 | 178 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -49,286 | 218,840 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Saka with Anderson in FPL?
Anderson has a form rating of 8.5 compared to Saka's 6.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Anderson costs £5.7m vs Saka's £10.0m.
How does Anderson compare to Saka on points?
Anderson has 178 total points this season vs Saka's 157 points. Anderson leads by 21 points overall.
Is Anderson worth the price over Saka?
Anderson costs £5.7m while Saka costs £10.0m — a difference of £4.3m. You save £4.3m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Saka and Anderson?
Saka has a net transfer flow of -49,286 this gameweek, while Anderson has 218,840 net transfers. Positive momentum for Anderson suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Saka to Anderson transfer?
If Anderson (£5.7m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Saka (£10.0m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.