Last refreshed
Rogers → Gibbs-White
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Rogers to Gibbs-White costs an extra £0.3m and gains 10 total points on the season. Gibbs-White currently sits at 8.8% ownership compared to Rogers's 20.5%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Gibbs-White averages a form rating of 6.0 compared to Rogers's 4.2, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Gibbs-White at 213,541 net vs Rogers at -107,185 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Rogers | Gibbs-White |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Aston Villa |  Nott'm Forest |
| Price | £7.3m | £7.6m |
| Form | 4.2 | 6.0 |
| Points | 169 | 179 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -107,185 | 213,541 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Rogers with Gibbs-White in FPL?
Gibbs-White has a form rating of 6.0 compared to Rogers's 4.2, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Gibbs-White costs £7.6m vs Rogers's £7.3m.
How does Gibbs-White compare to Rogers on points?
Gibbs-White has 179 total points this season vs Rogers's 169 points. Gibbs-White leads by 10 points overall.
Is Gibbs-White worth the price over Rogers?
Gibbs-White costs £7.6m while Rogers costs £7.3m — a difference of £0.3m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Gibbs-White delivers 179 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Rogers and Gibbs-White?
Rogers has a net transfer flow of -107,185 this gameweek, while Gibbs-White has 213,541 net transfers. Positive momentum for Gibbs-White suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Rogers to Gibbs-White transfer?
If Gibbs-White (£7.6m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Rogers (£7.3m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.