Last refreshed
Rogers → Anderson
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Rogers to Anderson saves £1.6m in budget and gains 9 total points on the season. Anderson currently sits at 9.2% ownership compared to Rogers's 20.5%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Anderson averages a form rating of 8.5 compared to Rogers's 4.2, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Anderson at 218,840 net vs Rogers at -107,185 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Rogers | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Aston Villa |  Nott'm Forest |
| Price | £7.3m | £5.7m |
| Form | 4.2 | 8.5 |
| Points | 169 | 178 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -107,185 | 218,840 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Rogers with Anderson in FPL?
Anderson has a form rating of 8.5 compared to Rogers's 4.2, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Anderson costs £5.7m vs Rogers's £7.3m.
How does Anderson compare to Rogers on points?
Anderson has 178 total points this season vs Rogers's 169 points. Anderson leads by 9 points overall.
Is Anderson worth the price over Rogers?
Anderson costs £5.7m while Rogers costs £7.3m — a difference of £1.6m. You save £1.6m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Rogers and Anderson?
Rogers has a net transfer flow of -107,185 this gameweek, while Anderson has 218,840 net transfers. Positive momentum for Anderson suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Rogers to Anderson transfer?
If Anderson (£5.7m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Rogers (£7.3m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.