Last refreshed
Rice → Gibbs-White
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Rice to Gibbs-White costs an extra £0.4m and loses 5 total points on the season. Gibbs-White currently sits at 8.8% ownership compared to Rice's 23.5%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Gibbs-White averages a form rating of 6.0 compared to Rice's 3.8, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Gibbs-White at 213,541 net vs Rice at -96,561 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Rice | Gibbs-White |
|---|---|---|
| Club | Arsenal | Nott'm Forest |
| Price | £7.2m | £7.6m |
| Form | 3.8 | 6.0 |
| Points | 184 | 179 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -96,561 | 213,541 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Rice with Gibbs-White in FPL?
Gibbs-White has a form rating of 6.0 compared to Rice's 3.8, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Gibbs-White costs £7.6m vs Rice's £7.2m.
How does Gibbs-White compare to Rice on points?
Gibbs-White has 179 total points this season vs Rice's 184 points. Rice leads by 5 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Gibbs-White worth the price over Rice?
Gibbs-White costs £7.6m while Rice costs £7.2m — a difference of £0.4m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Gibbs-White delivers 179 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Rice and Gibbs-White?
Rice has a net transfer flow of -96,561 this gameweek, while Gibbs-White has 213,541 net transfers. Positive momentum for Gibbs-White suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Rice to Gibbs-White transfer?
If Gibbs-White (£7.6m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Rice (£7.2m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.
Arsenal
Nott'm Forest