Last refreshed

Nørgaard → Dowman

Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.

Moving from Nørgaard to Dowman saves £0.9m in budget and gains 9 total points on the season. Dowman currently sits at 0.9% ownership compared to Nørgaard's 0.1%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.

In recent gameweeks, Dowman averages a form rating of 3.0 compared to Nørgaard's 1.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Dowman at 0 net vs Nørgaard at 0 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.

MetricNørgaardDowman
ClubARSArsenalARSArsenal
Price£5.1m£4.2m
Form1.03.0
Points716
Net Transfers (GW)00

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I replace Nørgaard with Dowman in FPL?
Dowman has a form rating of 3.0 compared to Nørgaard's 1.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Dowman costs £4.2m vs Nørgaard's £5.1m.
How does Dowman compare to Nørgaard on points?
Dowman has 16 total points this season vs Nørgaard's 7 points. Dowman leads by 9 points overall.
Is Dowman worth the price over Nørgaard?
Dowman costs £4.2m while Nørgaard costs £5.1m — a difference of £0.9m. You save £0.9m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Nørgaard and Dowman?
Nørgaard has a net transfer flow of 0 this gameweek, while Dowman has 0 net transfers. Transfer activity for Dowman is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the Nørgaard to Dowman transfer?
If Dowman (£4.2m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Nørgaard (£5.1m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.