Last refreshed
Mateta → Richarlison
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Mateta to Richarlison saves £1.1m in budget and gains 9 total points on the season. Richarlison currently sits at 7.9% ownership compared to Mateta's 8.2%, meaning the swap could serve as a differential move.
In recent gameweeks, Richarlison averages a form rating of 5.5 compared to Mateta's 2.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Richarlison at 214,489 net vs Mateta at -71,208 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Mateta | Richarlison |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Crystal Palace |  Spurs |
| Price | £7.6m | £6.5m |
| Form | 2.0 | 5.5 |
| Points | 108 | 117 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -71,208 | 214,489 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Mateta with Richarlison in FPL?
Richarlison has a form rating of 5.5 compared to Mateta's 2.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Richarlison costs £6.5m vs Mateta's £7.6m.
How does Richarlison compare to Mateta on points?
Richarlison has 117 total points this season vs Mateta's 108 points. Richarlison leads by 9 points overall.
Is Richarlison worth the price over Mateta?
Richarlison costs £6.5m while Mateta costs £7.6m — a difference of £1.1m. You save £1.1m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Mateta and Richarlison?
Mateta has a net transfer flow of -71,208 this gameweek, while Richarlison has 214,489 net transfers. Positive momentum for Richarlison suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Mateta to Richarlison transfer?
If Richarlison (£6.5m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Mateta (£7.6m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.