Last refreshed
Mateta → Bowen
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Mateta to Bowen costs an extra £0.2m and gains 67 total points on the season. Bowen currently sits at 15.6% ownership compared to Mateta's 8.2%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Bowen averages a form rating of 4.0 compared to Mateta's 2.0, giving the incoming player a clear edge on recent output. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Bowen at 385,777 net vs Mateta at -71,208 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
| Metric | Mateta | Bowen |
|---|---|---|
| Club |  Crystal Palace |  West Ham |
| Price | £7.6m | £7.8m |
| Form | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| Points | 108 | 175 |
| Net Transfers (GW) | -71,208 | 385,777 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Mateta with Bowen in FPL?
Bowen has a form rating of 4.0 compared to Mateta's 2.0, suggesting the move is justified by recent performance. Bowen costs £7.8m vs Mateta's £7.6m.
How does Bowen compare to Mateta on points?
Bowen has 175 total points this season vs Mateta's 108 points. Bowen leads by 67 points overall.
Is Bowen worth the price over Mateta?
Bowen costs £7.8m while Mateta costs £7.6m — a difference of £0.2m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Bowen delivers 175 season points.
What are the transfer trends for Mateta and Bowen?
Mateta has a net transfer flow of -71,208 this gameweek, while Bowen has 385,777 net transfers. Positive momentum for Bowen suggests managers are backing this move.
When is the best time to make the Mateta to Bowen transfer?
If Bowen (£7.8m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Mateta (£7.6m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.