Last refreshed
J.Timber → Saliba
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from J.Timber to Saliba costs an extra £0.3m and loses 12 total points on the season. Saliba currently sits at 17.1% ownership compared to J.Timber's 15.2%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Saliba averages a form rating of 0.0 compared to J.Timber's 0.0, putting both players level on recent performance. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Saliba at 0 net vs J.Timber at 0 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
ArsenalFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace J.Timber with Saliba in FPL?
Saliba has a form rating of 0.0 compared to J.Timber's 0.0, so the form difference is marginal — consider fixtures and upcoming blanks before moving. Saliba costs £6.3m vs J.Timber's £6.0m.
How does Saliba compare to J.Timber on points?
Saliba has 137 total points this season vs J.Timber's 149 points. J.Timber leads by 12 points, but recent form may tell a different story.
Is Saliba worth the price over J.Timber?
Saliba costs £6.3m while J.Timber costs £6.0m — a difference of £0.3m. The upgrade costs extra budget but Saliba delivers 137 season points.
What are the transfer trends for J.Timber and Saliba?
J.Timber has a net transfer flow of 0 this gameweek, while Saliba has 0 net transfers. Transfer activity for Saliba is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the J.Timber to Saliba transfer?
If Saliba (£6.3m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If J.Timber (£6.0m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.