Last refreshed
Havertz → Flemming
Replacement analysis by price, form and transfer momentum.
Moving from Havertz to Flemming saves £2.0m in budget and gains 63 total points on the season. Flemming currently sits at 0.8% ownership compared to Havertz's 0.7%, suggesting the community already favours the replacement.
In recent gameweeks, Flemming averages a form rating of 0.0 compared to Havertz's 0.0, putting both players level on recent performance. Net transfer activity this gameweek shows Flemming at 0 net vs Havertz at 0 net, reflecting the current market sentiment around both assets.
Arsenal
BurnleyFrequently Asked Questions
Should I replace Havertz with Flemming in FPL?
Flemming has a form rating of 0.0 compared to Havertz's 0.0, so the form difference is marginal — consider fixtures and upcoming blanks before moving. Flemming costs £5.3m vs Havertz's £7.3m.
How does Flemming compare to Havertz on points?
Flemming has 99 total points this season vs Havertz's 36 points. Flemming leads by 63 points overall.
Is Flemming worth the price over Havertz?
Flemming costs £5.3m while Havertz costs £7.3m — a difference of £2.0m. You save £2.0m which could fund upgrades elsewhere.
What are the transfer trends for Havertz and Flemming?
Havertz has a net transfer flow of 0 this gameweek, while Flemming has 0 net transfers. Transfer activity for Flemming is mixed — do your own fixture analysis.
When is the best time to make the Havertz to Flemming transfer?
If Flemming (£5.3m) is rising in price, transfer early to lock in the price. If Havertz (£7.3m) is falling, sell sooner to preserve value. Otherwise, wait until close to deadline for the latest injury and lineup news before confirming the swap.